1. Do you have an old account but can't access it?


    See Accessing your GIRS Account or Contact Us - We are here to help!

20 Species of Coral

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by abower, Jan 23, 2015.

  1. abower Well-Known ReefKeeper

    466
    Ryan, Ia
    Ratings:
    +74 / 1 / -0
    An update to legislation regarding the "20 species of coral ban". http://reefbuilders.com/2015/01/23/saltwater-aquatics-industry-major-jeopardy/
     
  2. danmgray Well-Known ReefKeeper

    307
    Sioux City, IA
    Ratings:
    +26 / 0 / -0
    I commented.
     
  3. Jamie

    Jamie Well-Known ReefKeeper Vendor

    591
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0 / -0

    Sent a comment,

    But I gotta say in their own words here "Primary threats identified include ocean warming, disease, and ocean acidification" so I have to ask how does leaving them there solve the problem? It does not make much sense to say that we are no longer able to collect these species but leave them in the acidified ocean only to eventually die? OR we can continue to collect and preserve as many as we can in captivity where they can be aquaculture and regrown. But hey leave it to the government to cause the death of these species. The real issue here is rising co2 levels NOT collection of a few corals.
     
  4. blackx-runner Administrator Website Team Leadership Team

    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Ratings:
    +738 / 5 / -0

    I think until the bulk of "hobbyists" change their ways its a lose, lose battle. There is still a demand for cheap, wild collected coral and fish. Unfortunately there is nothing more than "want" driving this demand. There is absolutely no need for us to keep tanks full of fish and coral. So any wild animals collected for the hobbyists can be conveyed as a bad thing and unfortunately far too many end up dead after a short lived life in someone's box of salt water and prove just that point.


    Is the collection from the wild for the hobby trade the biggest factor in the decline of corals? Not by a long shot. Will allowing collection for the hobby be the savior of declining coral species? In its current practice, I don't believe that either. The collecting, shipping and subsequent chopping of wild corals to sell directly to the hobbyists is a bad practice. For any species, endangered or not. I think wild collected coral and fish sold to directly to the hobbyist more often than not ends with a dead animal.


    There needs to be some regulations and control to ensure the long term survivability of these species whether it be in the wild or as aquacultered specimens in homes and public aquaria and research facilities. The umbrella policies of no collection and no trading surely isn't a great idea, but its typical goverment and lobbyist thinking. We need to have a voice in the matter, but at the same time we also have to make the necessary changes to actually ensure things are progressing in the right direction. That means no longer buying the usually cheaper, wild collected specimens. And also educating ourselves and fellow hobbyists of the a needs of that animal before we place it in the hostile micro ecosystems that we love to look at. Embracing aquaculture and education have to happen to get this hobby out of the crosshairs of the special interest groups and the government.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.